Sunday, 30 August 2015

How the US is neglecting its smartest kids

An article from the Finding Schools/ School's Choice Website

 http://findingschools.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/how-us-is-neglecting-its-smartest-kids.html

. Due out in September, a new book by Chester E. Finn and Brandon L Wright, Failing our Brightest Kids, raises the topic of the inability of our education systems to realize the potential of highly capable students.  Some states identify gifted students, but are not compelled to serve them.  Further, there is not much research demonstrating exactly what works best for gifted students.  Acceleration?  Enrichment?  Extracurriculars?  The author notes that highly capable students are actually a diverse group.  There is no, one-size-fits-all strategy that that is the educational solution for this entire cohort. 
The current debate in the field centers around gifted children vs gifted education.  Should efforts focus on learning strategies that will help gifted kids realize their potential?  Or is identification of gifted students more important.?  Considering the latter, there is no, unique definition of “gifted.”  Definitions vary among states and certainly among countries. 
When centering the discussion on gifted education, educational standards, quality, and methodology are the elements to take into account. Assuming adequate standards and high quality, what methodology is effective?  Giftedness may be addressed in different ways.  Typically schools form homogenous groups of gifted students in self-contained classrooms or pull-out programs.  Heterogeneous classrooms use differentiated instruction to meet the needs of capable learners.  It is important to note that offering simply an enriched curriculum is short sighted.  In fact, the highly capable cohort is comprised of individual learners, each with a unique profile.  Dr. Joyce Van Tassle-Baska called this out in her Myths About Gifted Students:   “They have even profiles in respect to intellectual ability, academic aptitude, and social emotional development.” In fact, each gifted student is different and must be viewed as a unique learner. 
Application of the principles of differentiated learning is no small task.  This requires extensive teacher training, flexibility, collaboration, metrics analysis and agility.  Assuming good implementation of this classroom strategy, the curriculum should offer appropriate challenges, strong content and exercises in higher order thinking, connection-making, meaningful product development and opportunities for  acceleration.  Current best practices in gifted education favor the most heterogeneous grouping with high quality differentiated curriculum. 
Regarding gifted students moving among states or countries, it is important to review policies and definitions.  Likely home and host countries/states will have different understandings of giftedness and gifted education.  Policies will vary.  There may be special identification processes.  To assure goodness of fit, families may consider gifted schools and clarify how the student will be assessed and/or investigate best heterogeneous grouping school options. 
Focusing the discussion on identifying gifted children may just label the child, overlooking the ultimate goal of getting the best out of each student.  It is more important to label gifted programs than to label children as gifted.  Giftedness should be seen as potential.  This conveys a dynamic sense of possibility, far from a static labeling process.  Gifted education must be preoccupied with responding to the students’ needs in order to develop their potential gifts and talents. 

Sara Schmidt
Director, Operations



Sunday, 23 August 2015

First reading: Piirto's Pyramid of Concept Development

What makes a TAG student succeed?

What aspects contribute to talent development and success in life?

THE PIIRTO PYRAMID OF TALENT DEVELOPMENT

Talent is not defined by a test score or a grade on a report card. Talent is not developed by one great teacher or one supportive parent.
Talent is influenced and supported at many levels by several different aspects of life. These aspects include:
1. The Genetic Aspect
People are born with certain dispositions, characteristics and personality traits. Twin studies show this. There are things that come naturally to who you are. These innate dispositions area basis or foundation for any potential success and talent development.
2. The Emotional Aspect: Personality Attributes
Working our way up towards talent development… who you are and what personality traits you have can lead to your talent development. Certain personality attributes exist in almost all highly successful and talented individuals across different domains.Studies show the following personalities traits are common among highly-talented individuals: creativity, imagination, insight, intuition, openness, overexcitabilities, passion, perceptiveness, perfectionism, persistence, resilience, risk-taking, self-discipline, self-efficacy, tolerance for ambiguity, and will.
3. The Cognitive Aspect: Intelligence
This is the IQ score. This is the 97% that the Oregon Department of Education recognizes in reading, math or intelligence. This is over-emphasized. Talent may be developed and an individual may become highly successful in life without this aspect, although it certainly does help.
4. The Talent Aspect
            “The talent itself — inborn, innate, mysterious, is absolutely necessary.” This is what becomes apparent in early childhood as an amazing ability to do something. It is the child that can throw a ball with unusual speed and accuracy, the astonishingly early reader, the students who can do advanced math in their heads.
5. The Vocational Aspect: Feeling a thorn or a calling
            Talent by itself does not mean success or talent development. A person needs the passion to follow their dreams and pursue a vocation that uses their talents. A person needs commitment to reach. A talent can incubate inside a person until their vocational aspect brings it out and begins to develop it.
6. The Environmental Aspect: 5 influences
            People are effected by their environment. This is true for everyone. There are five environmental factors that influence talent development. The first three have a larger impact than the smaller, last two.
            a. Home and Family – Talent seems to be nurtured in families. A family can nurture talent in children. However, if there is little family support, other environmental suns can nurture the talent.
            b. Community and Culture – This is necessary. The gifts and talents must be valued by the society at that time. There must be a need or desire in the greater society that values the talents and gifts offered by an individual in order for success to occur.
            c. School – Some specialty schools exist to further grown talent in individuals, especially as people get older (ex: art schools). Schools are one environmental aspect that can have a huge impact on building up or hindering talent development. Schools have an obligation to help students who may have been born with talent but who may have   other weak environmental influences (less support in family perhaps).
Smaller environmental influences, but still part of the aspect:
            d. Gender –This is an environmental influence based on perceptions of gender influences and skills in different talents. Some may be nurture more than others based on gender, or valued more or less based on gender.
            e. Chance – This can have a large influence. For example, the chance of where one is born can influence resources and support of talent.

Ideas to chase-up this month, after the Conference 'high' died down...

Looking ahead, it's a great time to look into the following, with future readings and consultations to follow;


  • Sternberg's 1985 Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
  • Gardner's seven types of intelligences
  • Alencar's Pentagon of Creativity
  • Tannebaums 'Sea Star' Model (2003)
  • Ian Warwick ten phases to achieve excellence
  • Piirto's pyrmaid concept of talent development (1994)
  • the five Federals (USA) definitions of Giftedness since 1970, including Sternberg and Detterman's 1986 twenty-four definitions

Draft review of highlights of the 2015 WCGTC conference, Odense, August

World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Odense Denmark10-14 August 2015Gavin Smith-Pill, VAGTC Committee member


This wide-ranging and very engaging conference was held for the first time in Denmark this year. Throughout a week punctuated with fine, warm weather compared to Melbourne’s winter delegates from around the globe enjoyed the exceptional opportunity to hear world-class educators and researchers talk about a range of subjects.

Odense is located two hours by train north-west of the Danish capital, Copenhagen. It is a noted Viking village, fishing port and more proudly for the Danes, the birthplace of Hans Christian Andersen, whose statues dominate the city and whose plays are performed every two hours in the park close to his original house, metres from the conference venue. During the conference Odense was also celebrating a flower festival, the beginnings of a poetry festival and commemorations for the birthday of famous Danish composter, Carl Nielsen. Odense is a vibrant city where the locals prefer to ride bicycles to work than drive cars, enjoy starting the day later rather than first-thing in the morning and seem to have an enjoyable lifestyle.
The 2015 World Council for Gifted and Talented Children formally opened on Monday 10 August by Dr Ken Hinckley and thereafter with a series of pre-conference workshops across the gamut of Gifted and talented Educational theory and practice. Presentations by Dr Leonie Kronborg (“Providing Optimal Learning Environments to Motivate Teachers and Gifted Students”) led a chorus of workshops by Dr Dorothy Sisk (“Nurturing and Developing Spiritual Intelligence”), Dr Ann Robinson (International Coaching for Gifted Adolescents”), Dr Sylvia Rimm (“Why Bright Kids get Poor Grades”) and other notable educational theorists and practitioners.
The primary keynote address by Dr. Shirley Kokot, ‘Planting a Garden’ began the first afternoon of the conference. Dr Kokot’s work for more than thirty years centred on the development of South Africa’s first school for gifted students, Radford House. She talked openly regarding the challenges of providing an educational focal point for underprivileged South African children and the political and social obstacles she and her staff endured on that journey. Following this fascinating speech were presentations from Dr Henry Tirri examining the technological shift needed to guide the teaching of gifted and talented children in the twenty-first century and finally, a rousing performance from the Danish National Ballet Company to round out the day.
During the week presenters from Australia, the USA, UK, Arabia and other nations continued workshops, keynotes and casual discussion sessions in the foyer and break-out areas of the accompanying Radisson hotel. Highlights included;

  • ·         Dr Sylvia Rimm “From Underachievement to Wondrous Achievement”, examining practical strategies for motivating and nurturing gifted students
  • ·         Dr Ching-Chih Kuo “Gifted Brain”, studying the gender differences of gifted children, their comparable perceptual capabilities and keys for teacher education with this knowledge
  • ·         Dr Jonathan Plucker examining “Critical Issues and Practices in Gifted Education”
  • ·         Dr Ann Robinson discussing “What makes a practice ‘Best’?” Evidence-based recommendations in Gifted Education
Separating the Keynote presentations were workshops from around the world, where delegates were invited to negotiate intricate and confusing timetables and room locations in order to learn more about a wide range of subjects. These subjects ranged from presenters talking about their journey developing Danish schools for the Gifted (Pernille Buch-Romer), to fascinating seminars on factors guiding creativity and intelligence identification in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and China. A presentation led by Dr Faisal Alamiri, formerly of Latrobe University, Bendigo and now working with Dr June Maker (USA) shared the growth of differentiation identification in Arabic states and pathways for the future. A Chinese delegation led by _____ shared the story of Beijing No.8 High School, comprising three hundred staff for three thousand students leading Chinese efforts in Gifted and Talented education that sees students completing eight years of formal education in a four year timespan. Currently working professionally in schools in Melbourne’s East, I found the information brought by these educators enlightening, as there has been a surge in Chinese and Arabic immigration into schools in those areas in recent years. Issues such as social intelligence, the speed of information recall and the signs of ‘classroom confidence’ as an indicator of creativity and talent, presented by practitioners and researchers from educational cultures very different from our own was fascinating.
Another rewarding session was the presentation led by Carmel Meehan, President of the VAGTC and Dr Susan Nikakis, Vice President of the VAGTC, with their findings on “Developing Identification Tools for Creatively Gifted Students”. Dauntingly, this session was held in the 2000-seat auditorium after the previous presenter used far more than her allocated time. This presentation examined common conceptions of the nature of creativity, how it is identified, understood and nurtured by educators. Using the ‘Four C’ model these presenters encouraged teachers to provide opportunities for gifted and talented learners to question facts and social norms, and to wonder, develop and test ideas before evaluating their findings. An audience from Australia, South Africa, Kenya and the UK to name a few were not only educated but entertained by Carmel and Susan as they engaged the audience in conversation and their insights.
Dr Katie McClarty, Head, Center for College & Career Success (USA) presented a fascinating study of PISA results identifying global trends according to the labeling of Gifted and Talented curricula in OECD countries. This study aligned OECD countries participating in PISA testing with the degree to which they provided for exceptional students, as nations catering for either ‘Gifted’, ‘Talented or Talent Development’, ‘Differentiation systems’ or had ‘No Provision’ for these students in their educational systems. Interestingly, Israel hosts the only special governmental division to cater specifically for gifted students, whilst Australia was recognized for its efforts to identify indigenous students in its population.
A common theme during the WCGTC conference was the models used to identify and illuminate gifted behaviours in children. Renzulii’s Triad Enrichment Model (1976) featured in as many presentations as Gagne’s Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (2008). However, many other speakers offered research, models and tests for consideration, such as; the VAST online creativity test by Guzik and Goff, an online application for iPad called the Reisman Diagnostic Creativity Assessment Tool (RDCA), the Alencar Pentagonal Model of Creativity and Ian Warwick’s ten-part Culture of Excellence model. Each of these elements created interesting and wide-ranging discussion as delegates deconstructed the models looking for ways to incorporate them into their domestic strategies.
Finally, on Thursday 13 August the conference was brought to a close by the WCGTC Denmark Conference Chair, Ole Kyed before the final evening’s festivities. Delegates were shuttled to the riverside marina and from there the collection of educators and researchers from around the world enjoyed a riverboat ride through Odense, followed by a walk through the local forest to enjoy a wonderful meal with new friends and colleagues in a 17th century restaurant. In front of most of the Australian delegation was more than thirty hours of flying and transferring through airports in Europe, Arabia and Asia on our way home. In little more than twenty-or-so months’ time the WCGTC conference will come to the University of New South Wales for the 2017 World Conference. I hope to see you there.


Gavin Smith-Pill

Monday, 10 August 2015

Hi from the Odense conference!

This week i'll be reporting from the World Council for Gifted and Talented Conference.

 Here's a little slideshow for you to browse!
https://sway.com/4vHSVCWodwQ3FkXO